E_1_09

Solar Storms and Miyake Events

Verified (Tier 1)
Confidence: 4/5 Section: E Updated: March 9, 2026
Source Count: 14 | Weighted Score: 34 | Source Confidence: [4/5] | Primary Tier: 1 | Last Updated: March 9, 2026
Keywords: solar storm, Carrington Event, coronal mass ejection, CME, Miyake event, solar proton event, radiocarbon spike, 14C, 774 CE, 993 CE, 660 BCE, geomagnetic storm, aurora, solar cycle, tree ring, space weather, electromagnetic pulse
Category Tags: cataclysms, solar activity, climate, dating, space weather
Cross-References: E_4_12 — Dendrochronology Tree Ring · E_4_10 — Ice Core Science Climate · E_4_09 — Magnetic Pole Reversals Laschamp · E_4_07 — Calendar Systems Ancient Timekeeping

QUICK SUMMARY

The Sun periodically releases enormous bursts of energy — coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar proton events (SPEs) — that interact with Earth's magnetosphere and can have devastating consequences for technology-dependent civilization. The most powerful historically recorded event was the Carrington Event (September 1–2, 1859): a CME that produced aurorae visible to the tropics and induced currents in telegraph systems worldwide, causing fires, shocks to operators, and transmission of messages on unpowered lines. Modern modeling (National Academy of Sciences, 2008; Lloyd's of London, 2013) estimates that a Carrington-class storm today could cause $1–2 trillion in damage in the first year, with recovery taking 4–10 years due to destruction of high-voltage transformers (long lead-time components). Beyond historical records, Miyake events represent a class of extreme solar/cosmic radiation bursts discovered through their signature: abrupt, precisely datable spikes in radiocarbon (¹⁴C) and ¹⁰Be concentrations in tree rings and ice cores. Fusa Miyake (2012, Nature) identified the first such event at 774–775 CE — a ¹⁴C spike ~20× larger than normal solar cycle variation. These events have since become invaluable chronological anchors: the 774/775 CE event has been used to precisely date Viking activity (L'Anse aux Meadows timber), early medieval constructions, and volcanic eruptions. Additional Miyake events have been identified at 993–994 CE, 660 BCE, 5259 BCE, 5410 BCE, 7176 BCE, and potentially others. The cause remains debated — extreme solar flares, gamma-ray bursts, or magnetar events have all been proposed — though solar origin is favored for most events.


1. VERIFIED CLAIMS (Tier 1 — Peer-Reviewed / Scholarly Consensus)

1.1 Carrington Event (1859)

1.2 774/775 CE Miyake Event

1.3 Additional Confirmed Miyake Events


2. CREDIBLE CLAIMS (Tier 2 — Academic / Debated but Supported)

2.1 Modern Vulnerability

2.2 Miyake Events as Supernova/Gamma-Ray Burst Candidates

2.3 Frequency and Historical Impact


3. SPECULATIVE CLAIMS (Tier 3 — Possible but Unverified)

3.1 Ancient Catastrophe Triggers


4. DUBIOUS CLAIMS (Tier 4 — No Credible Source / Contradicted by Evidence)

4.1 Solar Micronova / Catastrophist Claims

Counter-Arguments


IMAGES

#DescriptionFilenameSourceLicense

No images assigned yet.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Miyake, F. et al | 2012 | "A Signature of Cosmic-Ray Increase in AD 774–775 from Tree Rings in Japan" | Nature | ∅ | 486::240–242 | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1038/nature11123 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  2. Miyake, F. et al | 2013 | "Another Rapid Event in the Carbon-14 Content of Tree Rings" | Nature Communications | ∅ | 4::1748 | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1038/ncomms2783 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  3. Usoskin, I.G. et al | 2013 | "The AD775 Cosmic Event Revisited: The Sun Is to Blame" | Astronomy & Astrophysics | ∅ | 552:: | L3 | ∅ | doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321080 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  4. Mekhaldi, F. et al | 2015 | "Multiradionuclide Evidence for the Solar Origin of the Cosmic-Ray Events of AD 774/5 and 993/4" | Nature Communications | ∅ | 6::8611 | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1038/ncomms9611 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  5. Brehm, N. et al | 2022 | "Tree-Ring Radiocarbon Reveals Reduced Solar Activity during Miyake Events" | Nature Communications | ∅ | 13::1196 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  6. Park, J. et al | 2017 | "Confirming the Existence of a Grand 14C Excursion in ~660 BC" | Radiocarbon | ∅ | 59.6::1–9 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  7. Kuitems, M. et al | 2022 | "Evidence for European Presence in the Americas in AD 1021" | Nature | ∅ | 601::388–391 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  8. Baker, D.N. et al | 2013 | "A Major Solar Eruptive Event in July 2012" | Space Weather | ∅ | 11::585–591 | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1002/swe.20097 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  9. National Academy of Sciences | 2008 | ∅ | Severe Space Weather Events—Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts | ∅ | ∅ | National Academies Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  10. Carrington, R.C | 1860 | "Description of a Singular Appearance Seen in the Sun on September 1, 1859" | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | ∅ | 20::13–15 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  11. McCracken, K.G. et al | 2004 | "A Phenomenological Study of the Long-Term Cosmic Ray Modulation, 850–1958 AD" | Journal of Geophysical Research | ∅ | 109:: | A12103 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  12. Hambaryan, V.V.; Neuhäuser, R | 2013 | "A Galactic Short Gamma-Ray Burst as Cause for the ¹⁴C Peak in AD 774/5" | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | ∅ | 430::32–36 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  13. Lloyd's of London | 2013 | ∅ | Solar Storm Risk to the North American Electric Grid | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
  14. Büntgen, U. et al | 2018 | "Tree Rings Reveal Globally Coherent Signature of Cosmogenic Radiocarbon Events in 774 and 993 CE" | Nature Communications | ∅ | 9::3605 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX


Last Updated: March 9, 2026


⚠️ AI-Assisted Research Disclaimer

This document was generated and structured with the assistance of AI tools.

While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, AI-assisted content may

contain errors, misattributions, or unintended inaccuracies. Always verify claims, dates, and sources independently before citing or relying

on any information presented here.

  • Sources may contain errors. Bibliography entries and cross-references

are checked by automated systems, but mistakes can occur. If something

looks wrong, it may be.

  • Speculative and unverified claims are clearly labeled. This project

uses a four-tier evidence system:

  • Tier 1 — Verified: Peer-reviewed, established scientific consensus.
  • Tier 2 — Credible: Academically supported, debated but grounded.
  • Tier 3 — Speculative: Plausible but unverified by mainstream science.
  • Tier 4 — Dubious: No credible support or contradicted by evidence.
  • This project maps multiple perspectives — not a single truth. Mainstream,

alternative, and skeptical viewpoints are presented side by side for

critical comparison, not endorsement. Inclusion does not imply agreement.

  • We are actively improving. Source verification, factuality scoring,

and bibliography enrichment are ongoing. Each revision adds stronger

citations, corrects identified errors, and expands coverage.

📖 For full details on our verification methodology, scoring systems, and

quality metrics, see: Fact-Checking & Verification Systems

Think Openly. Check the sources. Draw your own conclusions.