Source Count: 15 | Weighted Score: 31 | Source Confidence: [4/5] | Primary Tier: 1 | Last Updated: March 11, 2026
Keywords: animism, new animism, relational ontology, perspectivism, Viveiros de Castro, Descola, Bird-David, Ingold, multispecies ethnography, ontological turn, indigenous ontology, non-human personhood, agent, sentience, relational epistemology, Ojibwe, Achuar, Amazonian
Category Tags: being and entities, anthropology, ontology, indigenous philosophy, relational thought
Cross-References: P_1_03 — Panpsychism · C_5_03 — Animism in Tribal Traditions · K_1_10 — Consciousness and Nature · ZB_1_14 — Animal Architecture · ZC_4_09 — Visual Anthropology

QUICK SUMMARY

"New animism" refers to a scholarly reinterpretation of animism — the attribution of life, intentionality, personhood, or agency to non-human entities (animals, plants, stones, rivers, weather phenomena, artifacts) — that has emerged since the 1990s as a serious intellectual framework in anthropology, philosophy, and ecology, after decades in which animism was dismissed as a "primitive error." The term "animism" was originally coined by E.B. Tylor (Primitive Culture, 1871) as the "minimum definition of religion" — the belief that natural objects and phenomena possess souls — and was treated as the earliest, most erroneous stage in a progressive evolution from savage superstition to civilized science. The new animism radically reframes this understanding. Nurit Bird-David (1999, Current Anthropology) — building on her fieldwork with the Nayaka of South India — proposed that animism is not a failed ontological theory about what things "have" (souls) but a relational epistemology: a way of knowing the world through relationship and engagement rather than through classification and objectification. For the Nayaka, being a "person" is not an intrinsic property of biological humans but a relational category that can include animals, trees, hills, and spirits — anything one enters into a relationship of mutual responsiveness with. Eduardo Viveiros de Castro (1998, 2014) — working with Amazonian peoples (Araweté, Yawalapíti) — developed perspectivism: the idea that different beings (human, jaguar, spirit, fish) all experience themselves as "persons" occupying a "human" perspective, but perceive other beings differently depending on their species-specific embodiment — jaguars see blood as beer, humans see it as blood. This is not metaphor or belief but a different ontology — a different account of what kinds of beings exist and how they relate. Philippe Descola (Beyond Nature and Culture, 2005/2013) extended this into a global comparative framework, identifying four fundamental ontological modes: naturalism (Western: shared physical nature, different cultures/minds), animism (shared interiority/personhood, different physical forms), totemism (shared physical and interior qualities within species-groups), and analogism (everything is different but connected through correspondences). The "ontological turn" in anthropology — associated with Descola, Viveiros de Castro, Tim Ingold, Marilyn Strathern, and others — takes indigenous ontologies seriously as philosophy, not as exotic beliefs to be explained away. This has profound implications for environmental ethics, animal rights, legal personhood for rivers and ecosystems (already enacted in New Zealand, Ecuador, and India), and the critique of Western nature/culture dualism.

1. VERIFIED CLAIMS (Tier 1 — Peer-Reviewed / Experimentally Confirmed)

1.1 Tylor's Classical Animism and Its Limitations

• E.B. Tylor (Primitive Culture, 1871) defined animism as the belief that natural objects possess souls (anima) — he considered it the earliest stage of religion, arising from misinterpretation of dreams, death, and shadows:
• Tylor's framework was evolutionary and hierarchical: animism → polytheism → monotheism → science, with each stage correcting the errors of the previous
• This framework dominated anthropology for a century and led to the dismissal of animist worldviews as intellectually primitive
• The critique of Tylor's framework is now well-established:
• It imports Western ontological assumptions (the division between animate/inanimate, mind/matter, person/thing) and judges non-Western systems by whether they conform to these categories
• It treats animism as a propositional belief ("this rock has a soul") rather than as a mode of engagement with the world
• It fails to account for the sophistication and internal coherence of animist systems when understood on their own terms

1.2 Bird-David's Relational Epistemology

• Nurit Bird-David (1999, "Animism Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology," Current Anthropology) — one of the foundational texts of the new animism:
• Based on fieldwork with the Nayaka (a foraging people of South India), Bird-David argued that animism is not about attributing souls to objects but about relating to aspects of the environment as persons
• Personhood in Nayaka understanding is constituted through relationships (devaru — beings one has reciprocal relationships with — can include hills, trees, animals, and spirits)
• The epistemological mode is "dividual" rather than individual: knowledge comes through engagement and relationship rather than through detached observation and categorization
• This is a relational epistemology, not a "primitive physics" — the Nayaka are not making empirical errors about what has a soul; they are operating within a different framework for what counts as a person and how knowledge is produced

1.3 Descola's Four Ontological Modes

• Philippe Descola (Par-delà nature et culture, 2005; English: Beyond Nature and Culture, 2013):
• Descola proposed that all human societies organize the relationship between self and world along two axes: interiority (mind, soul, intentionality) and physicality (body, material form) — and whether other beings are considered similar or different to humans along each axis
• This generates four ontological modes:

1. Naturalism (Western): all beings share a physical nature (matter, biology), but differ in interiority (only humans have rational minds/culture) — the nature/culture divide
2. Animism: all beings share interiority (personhood, agency), but differ in physical form (human body vs. jaguar body vs. tree body)
3. Totemism (Australian Aboriginal): groups of beings (human clans and their totemic species) share both interiority and physicality — they are the "same kind"
4. Analogism (Chinese, Mesoamerican, medieval European): everything is different from everything else, but all things are connected through elaborate systems of correspondence and analogy

• Descola's framework is the most comprehensive comparative model of human ontological diversity and has been widely adopted (and debated) in anthropology

1.4 Legal Personhood for Non-Human Entities

• The philosophical framework of the new animism has contributed to real-world legal developments:
• Ecuador (2008): the national constitution grants legal rights to Pachamama (Nature/Mother Earth), the first country to constitutionalize the rights of nature
• New Zealand (2017): the Whanganui River (Te Awa Tupua) was granted legal personhood — reflecting the Māori understanding of the river as an ancestor and living entity. Two guardians (one government, one Māori) represent the river's interests in legal proceedings.
• India (2017): the Ganges and Yamuna rivers were temporarily granted legal personhood (later stayed by the Supreme Court)
• Bolivia (2010): the Law of the Rights of Mother Earth (Ley de Derechos de la Madre Tierra) grants rights to nature as a collective subject
• These legal developments translate animist/relational ontology into Western legal frameworks — demonstrating the practical, political consequences of taking non-Western ontologies seriously

2. CREDIBLE CLAIMS (Tier 2 — Academic / Debated but Supported)

2.1 Viveiros de Castro's Multinaturalism and Perspectivism

• Eduardo Viveiros de Castro (1998, "Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism," JRAI; 2014, Cannibal Metaphysics):
• Amazonian peoples describe a world of multinaturalism (one culture, many natures) rather than the Western multiculturalism (one nature, many cultures):
• All beings — humans, jaguars, spirits, vultures — share a common cultural perspective (all experience themselves as "people" living in "villages," drinking "beer," performing "rituals")
• But each species has a different body that produces a different perspective: what humans see as blood, jaguars see as beer; what humans see as a muddy wallow, tapirs see as a ceremonial house
• Perspectivism is cosmologically organized through predation and shamanism: shamans are those who can adopt the perspective of other species (through ayahuasca, tobacco, fasting) and return to communicate what they learned
• This is not "mere belief" but an ontological framework as internally consistent as Western naturalism — it produces different knowledge practices, ethical obligations, and ecological relationships

2.2 Tim Ingold's Meshwork and Dwelling

• Tim Ingold (The Perception of the Environment, 2000; Being Alive, 2011):
• Ingold argues that the Western ontological distinction between "organism" and "environment" (or "nature" and "culture") is an artifact of a particular intellectual tradition, not a universal truth
• He proposes a "dwelling perspective": organisms don't exist separately from their environments — they are constituted by their relational engagement with the world through movement, perception, and skilled practice
• The environment is not a container for organisms but a meshwork of intertwined paths, processes, and relationships
• This perspective converges with animist ontologies: if personhood is constituted through relationship rather than intrinsic substance, then the boundary between "person" and "environment" dissolves

2.3 Multispecies Ethnography

• Emerging from the new animism and the ontological turn, multispecies ethnography (Kirksey & Helmreich 2010) studies the entangled lives of humans and non-humans:
• Field studies of human-animal relationships (e.g., Kohn's How Forests Think, 2013 — how Runa people in Amazonian Ecuador relate to forest ecologies as semiotic systems)
• Donna Haraway's When Species Meet (2008) — critique of human exceptionalism and the productive entanglements of companion species
• Anna Tsing's The Mushroom at the End of the World (2015) — matsutake mushroom networks as windows into multispecies capitalism
• This anthropological movement takes seriously the agency, intentionality, and communicative capacity of non-human organisms — without necessarily attributing "consciousness" in the philosophical sense

3. SPECULATIVE CLAIMS (Tier 3 — Possible but Unverified)

3.1 New Animism as Foundation for Ecological Ethics

• Scholars propose that relational ontology provides a better philosophical foundation for environmental ethics than Western frameworks:
• If rivers, forests, and species are persons with whom humans have relationships of reciprocity and obligation, environmental destruction becomes a form of relational violence — destroying a community member, not merely consuming a resource
• This framework could provide philosophical grounding for deep ecology, conservation biology, and climate ethics
• However, the translation of animist relational ethics into policy within industrialized societies remains largely aspirational — the legal personhood experiments (Ecuador, New Zealand) are early steps

3.2 Convergence with Panpsychism?

• Some writers draw parallels between the new animism and panpsychism (P_1_03) — the philosophical position that consciousness or experience is a fundamental feature of all matter:
• Both challenge the Western assumption that consciousness/experience is confined to human brains (or complex nervous systems)
• However, the new animism is a relational and social ontology (personhood is constituted through relationships), while panpsychism is typically a substance ontology (consciousness is an intrinsic property of matter)
• The convergence may be more superficial than substantive — Viveiros de Castro explicitly distinguishes perspectivism from panpsychism

4. DUBIOUS CLAIMS (Tier 4 — No Credible Source / Contradicted by Evidence)

4.1 Animist Peoples "Really Believe" Rocks Have Minds

• [MISLEADING] The new animism's central insight is precisely that this framing distorts animist thought — animism is not a propositional belief about the internal properties of objects but a relational mode of engagement. The question "do they really believe the rock has a mind?" imposes Western substance ontology on a relational system.

4.2 The Ontological Turn Is Just Cultural Relativism

• [INCORRECT] The ontological turn argues that different societies inhabit different ontologies (different configurations of what exists), not merely different epistemologies (different beliefs about the same world). This is a stronger claim than relativism and has generated significant philosophical debate.

IMAGES

No images assigned yet.

COUNTER-ARGUMENTS & CRITICISMS

• Todd Sanders, David Graeber, and others have criticized the ontological turn as potentially romanticizing indigenous thought while obscuring political-economic realities (colonialism, extraction, dispossession) that are more urgent than ontological differences
• The claim that animist peoples inhabit a fundamentally "different ontology" risks essentializing indigenous groups as inherently "other" — potentially reproducing the primitivism the ontological turn claims to overcome
• Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholars note that the ontological turn sometimes treats Western science as a monolithic "naturalism" when in practice, scientists routinely engage with non-human agency (in epidemiology, ecology, animal behavior) without requiring ontological transformation
• The concept of "relational personhood" may be so broad that it loses analytical precision — if anything one relates to can be a "person," the category may explain nothing
• Legal personhood for rivers and ecosystems, while innovative, faces practical enforcement challenges and may function more as symbolic politics than effective environmental protection

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Bird-David, N | 1999 | "'Animism' Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology" | Current Anthropology | ∅ | ∅ | 40.S1 : S_5_13 S91 | ∅ | doi:10.1086/200061 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
2. Viveiros de Castro, E | 1998 | "Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism" | Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute | ∅ | 4.3::469–488 | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.2307/3034157 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
3. Viveiros de Castro, E | 2014 | ∅ | Cannibal Metaphysics | ∅ | ∅ | Trans | ∅ | isbn:9781937561970 | ∅ | ∅ | P; Skafish; Univocal
4. Descola, P | 2013 | ∅ | Beyond Nature and Culture | ∅ | ∅ | Trans | ∅ | doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001, isbn:9780226144450 | ∅ | ∅ | J; Lloyd; University of Chicago Press, [2005]
5. Ingold, T | 2000 | ∅ | The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill | ∅ | ∅ | Routledge | ∅ | doi:10.4324/9781003196662 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
6. Kohn, E | 2013 | ∅ | How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human | ∅ | ∅ | University of California Press | ∅ | doi:10.19181/socjour.2015.21.2.1327 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
7. Haraway, D.J | 2008 | ∅ | When Species Meet | ∅ | ∅ | University of Minnesota Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
8. Tsing, A.L | 2015 | ∅ | The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins | ∅ | ∅ | Princeton University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
9. Harvey, G | 2005 | ∅ | Animism: Respecting the Living World | ∅ | ∅ | Columbia University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
10. Tylor, E.B | 1871 | ∅ | Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom | ∅ | ∅ | 2 vols | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | John Murray
11. Hallowell, A.I | 1960 | "Ojibwa Ontology, Behavior, and World View" | Culture in History | ∅ | ∅ | In , ed | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | Diamond, 19 52; Columbia University Press
12. Kirksey, S.E.; Helmreich, S | 2010 | "The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography" | Cultural Anthropology | ∅ | 25.4::545–576 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
13. de la Cadena, M | 2015 | ∅ | Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds | ∅ | ∅ | Duke University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
14. Stengers, I | 2012 | "Reclaiming Animism" | e-flux | ∅ | ∅ | 36 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
15. Holbraad, M.; Pedersen, M.A | 2017 | ∅ | The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition | ∅ | ∅ | Cambridge University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

Generated from cross-cutting keyword analysis — "animism" appears in 8 docs across 5 sections. Last Updated: March 11, 2026