Magnetic Pole Reversals and the Laschamp Event

Document ID: E_4_09
Section: E_Cataclysms_and_Chronology
Keywords: geomagnetic reversal, magnetic pole, Laschamp Event, 42000 BP, Adams Event, Neanderthal extinction, megafauna, cave art, cosmic radiation, ozone depletion, South Atlantic Anomaly, Brunhes-Matuyama, magnetic excursion, paleomagnetic, magnetosphere, aurora, satellite vulnerability, power grid, ¹⁰Be, ¹⁴C, geodynamo
Category Tags: cataclysms, chronology, art-culture
Cross-References: E_4_03 · O_1_02 · R_1_03 · R_2_03 · S_4_01
Reliability Tier: Tier 1-2 (reversals are well-documented; Laschamp excursion confirmed; biological/civilizational impacts debated)
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026 | Source Count: 26 | Weighted Score: 66 | Source Confidence: [5/5] | Confidence: Very High (reversal occurrence); High (Laschamp dating and characteristics); Medium (Adams Event biological correlations); Low (predictions for next reversal)

QUICK SUMMARY

Earth's magnetic field periodically undergoes geomagnetic reversals — events in which the north and south magnetic poles swap polarity. This has occurred at least 183 times in the last 83 million years, with the last full reversal (the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal) happening approximately 780,000 years ago. Between full reversals, shorter-duration magnetic excursions occur, during which the field weakens dramatically and the poles wander without completing a full swap. The most significant recent excursion was the Laschamp Event (~42,000 years before present), during which Earth's magnetic field dropped to approximately 6% of its normal strength for ~800 years, with a transitional period lasting ~1,500 years. In 2021, Cooper et al. dubbed the Laschamp excursion the "Adams Event" and presented evidence correlating it with several major biological and cultural phenomena: the extinction of Neanderthals, the decline of Australian megafauna, the sudden explosion of cave art in Europe and Southeast Asia, and increased use of ochre pigments (possibly as sunscreen against elevated UV radiation). During a reversal or excursion, the weakened magnetic field allows greatly increased cosmic radiation to reach Earth's surface, potentially causing ozone layer depletion, climate disruption, and biological stress. The South Atlantic Anomaly — a region of currently weakened magnetic field over South America and the South Atlantic — has led to speculation that Earth may be entering another excursion or the early stages of a future reversal, with potentially profound implications for our technology-dependent civilization.

1. VERIFIED CLAIMS (Tier 1 — Peer-Reviewed / Archaeological Record)

1.1 Geomagnetic Reversals — The Phenomenon

Parameter	Data
Definition	Complete swap of magnetic north and south poles; dipole field reverses by 180°
Frequency	Irregular; average interval ~200,000–300,000 years over the last 5 million years, but highly variable (from ~10,000 to millions of years)
Duration of transition	Typically 1,000–10,000 years for the reversal process
Number recorded	183 reversals in the last 83 million years (geomagnetic polarity timescale — GPTS)
Evidence	Recorded in volcanic rocks (thermoremanent magnetization), ocean floor magnetic stripes (Vine-Matthews-Morley hypothesis), and sedimentary records
Last full reversal	Brunhes-Matuyama: ~780,000 years ago
Current field direction	"Normal" polarity (geographic and magnetic north approximately aligned)

The magnetic field is generated by the geodynamo: convective motion of liquid iron in Earth's outer core
Reversals are a natural consequence of the chaotic dynamics of the core — they are not periodic but statistical
The magnetic polarity timescale is one of the key tools for dating oceanic crust and validating plate tectonics

1.2 Magnetic Excursions — Partial Reversals

Excursion	Date	Duration	Notes
Laschamp	~42,000 BP	~800 years (transitional: ~1,500 years)	Best-studied excursion; field dropped to ~6% of normal
Mono Lake	~34,000 BP	~2,000 years	Researchers consider this part of the same instability as Laschamp
Blake	~120,000 BP	~5,000 years	Recorded in North Atlantic sediments
Gothenburg	~13,000 BP	~1,000 years	Debated — may or may not be a true excursion
Norwegian-Greenland Sea	~65,000 BP	~2,000 years	Recorded in marine sediments

Excursions are distinguished from full reversals by their shorter duration and the fact that the field returns to its original polarity
During excursions, the dipole field collapses and the non-dipole (multipolar) components dominate — resulting in multiple simultaneous magnetic poles and complex field geometries
The field during excursions is typically 10–25% of normal strength, sometimes as low as 5–6%

1.3 The Laschamp Event — Confirmed Data

Parameter	Data
Date	~41,400 ± 2,000 years BP (U-Th dating of Laschamp lava flows, Massif Central, France)
Discovery	Bonhommet and Babkine (1967): reversely magnetized lava flows at Laschamp and Olby, France
Field strength	Dropped to ~6% of present value (based on cosmogenic isotope production rates)
Polarity	Briefly reversed (VGP — Virtual Geomagnetic Pole — reached southern latitudes)
Duration	Main excursion ~800 years; transitional instability ~1,500 years
Cosmogenic isotope evidence	¹⁰Be and ³⁶Cl spikes in ice cores at ~42,000 BP — consistent with dramatically increased cosmic ray flux to Earth's surface
¹⁴C anomaly	Radiocarbon production rate spiked during Laschamp — complicates ¹⁴C dating of this period

1.4 Discovery History and Geodynamo Mechanics

Discovery of Geomagnetic Reversals:

Bernard Brunhes (1906) first recognized reversed magnetization in Pliocene lava flows at Pont Farin, near Clermont-Ferrand, France — the finding was initially met with skepticism
Motonori Matuyama (1929) demonstrated that reversed magnetization in Japanese and Korean basalts correlated with geological age, establishing that the field had reversed systematically
The Vine-Matthews-Morley hypothesis (1963) explained marine magnetic anomaly "stripes" — symmetric bands of normal and reversed magnetization flanking mid-ocean ridges — as a record of polarity reversals frozen into newly formed oceanic crust during seafloor spreading, simultaneously confirming both seafloor spreading and the reality of geomagnetic reversals

GPTS Calibration and Reversal Statistics:

The geomagnetic polarity timescale is calibrated using radiometric dating (⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar, U-Pb) of volcanic rocks with known magnetic polarity, biostratigraphy, and astronomical tuning of marine sediment records
The full GPTS documents over 300 polarity intervals in the last 160 Ma; reversal interval lengths approximate a Poisson process with a time-varying rate — implying reversals are quasi-random with no reliable predictive periodicity (Constable, 2003)
The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (~84–124 Ma) represents an extraordinary ~40-million-year period with few or no reversals, possibly related to changes in heat flux at the core-mantle boundary

VGP Paths and Transition Dynamics:

Virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) paths during reversals show complex, sometimes looping trajectories — some records suggest preferential paths through the Americas and East Asia, though this pattern is debated due to uneven global sampling
During the Matuyama-Brunhes reversal (~780 ka), the transition lasted approximately 7,000–22,000 years depending on location and recording medium (sedimentary vs. volcanic)

Geodynamo Simulation and Inner Core Dynamics:

The geodynamo is powered by both thermal convection and compositional convection — release of lighter elements (S, O, Si) as the solid inner core grows by freezing from the outer core liquid
The inner core (~1,220 km radius, solid iron) grows by approximately 1 mm/year, releasing latent heat and compositional buoyancy that sustain the geodynamo
Numerical geodynamo simulations (Glatzmaier & Roberts, 1995; Kuang & Bloxham, 1997) reproduce self-sustaining magnetic fields that spontaneously reverse polarity, demonstrating that reversals are an intrinsic property of the geodynamo rather than requiring external triggers
The South Atlantic Anomaly may relate to core-mantle boundary heterogeneity — possibly a large low-shear-velocity province (LLSVP) beneath Africa that has produced similar regional anomalies repeatedly without necessarily leading to full reversal

2. CREDIBLE CLAIMS (Tier 2 — Academic / Debated but Supported)

2.1 The "Adams Event" — Cooper et al. (2021)

In a landmark 2021 paper in Science, Alan Cooper and colleagues proposed that the Laschamp excursion — which they dubbed the "Adams Event" (after Douglas Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, who wrote about the answer being 42) — had dramatic environmental and biological consequences:

Correlation	Evidence	Proposed Mechanism
Neanderthal extinction	Last firmly dated Neanderthal remains: ~42,000–40,000 BP; coincides with Laschamp	Increased UV radiation → habitat stress → competitive disadvantage vs. Homo sapiens
Australian megafauna decline	Many species' final dates cluster around 42,000 BP	Vegetation changes from UV/climate stress
Cave art explosion	Oldest firmly dated cave art (El Castillo, Sulawesi): ~40,000–42,000 BP	Increased UV → humans driven into caves → cave art as cultural adaptation
Ochre use increase	Archaeological evidence of increased ochre pigment use ~42,000 BP	Ochre as UV-protective body paint (possible sunscreen function)
Ozone depletion	Modeling: weakened magnetic field → increased ionization of atmosphere → catalytic ozone destruction	UV-B and UV-C radiation increased at surface; vegetation stress
Climate shifts	Kauri tree (New Zealand) ¹⁴C record shows atmospheric changes correlating with Laschamp	Disrupted atmospheric chemistry → altered wind patterns and precipitation

Cooper et al. used New Zealand kauri trees (Agathis australis) — ancient trees preserved in bogs — to create a high-resolution ¹⁴C record spanning the Laschamp excursion
Their atmospheric chemistry modeling suggested that the combination of weakened magnetic field + solar minimum (Grand Solar Minimum within the Laschamp period) was the critical factor

2.2 Criticisms and Limitations of the Adams Event Hypothesis

Criticism	Detail
Correlation ≠ causation	Many events cluster around 42,000 BP but direct causal links are difficult to establish
Neanderthal decline	Neanderthal extinction was already underway (population decline evident from ~50,000 BP); multiple factors: climate, competition with Homo sapiens, genetic bottlenecks
UV modeling	Ozone depletion estimates depend heavily on assumptions about solar activity; some atmospheric models suggest effects would be regional rather than global
Cave art dating	Cave art dates are contentious; some art may be older; the "explosion" may partly reflect dating method availability
Alternative explanations	The ~42,000 BP period coincides with other significant changes: Heinrich Event 4 (ice-rafting in North Atlantic), Campanian Ignimbrite eruption (39,000 BP) — multiple confounding factors

The Adams Event hypothesis has been influential but not universally accepted
It has succeeded in drawing attention to the biological significance of geomagnetic changes — previously a neglected area

2.3 Effects During Reversals/Excursions

Effect	Mechanism	Evidence
Increased cosmic radiation	Weakened magnetic field allows more galactic cosmic rays and solar energetic particles to reach the atmosphere and surface	¹⁰Be and ³⁶Cl spikes in ice cores during Laschamp
Ozone depletion	Increased ionization produces NOₓ in the stratosphere → catalytic ozone destruction	Modeled; supported by malformed spore tetrads in some records
Increased ¹⁴C production	More cosmic rays → more neutron capture by ¹⁴N → more ¹⁴C	Confirmed by radiocarbon calibration data
Aurora at low latitudes	Without dipole field, solar wind particles reach lower latitudes	Historical reports of aurora at equatorial latitudes during minor field weakening
No mass extinction	No clear mass extinction correlates with any known reversal in the Phanerozoic	The biological effects, if any, are subtle rather than catastrophic

3. SPECULATIVE CLAIMS (Tier 3 — Possible but Unverified)

3.1 South Atlantic Anomaly — Precursor to Next Reversal?

Parameter	Data
Location	Centered over South America and South Atlantic Ocean (~28°S, 45°W)
Nature	Region where Earth's magnetic field is ~30% weaker than expected for its latitude
Current trend	The SAA is growing and drifting westward at ~0.3–0.5°/year
Satellite effects	Increased radiation exposure for satellites passing through the SAA; International Space Station crew receives higher radiation doses in this region
Interpretation	Some geophysicists interpret the SAA as possible evidence that the dipole field is destabilizing — a potential precursor to reversal or excursion

The global magnetic dipole moment has decreased by ~9% since 1840 (first reliable measurements)
At this rate, the dipole could reach zero in ~1,500–2,000 years — BUT the decline may be oscillatory rather than leading to reversal
Prediction is impossible: the geodynamo is chaotic; no method exists to reliably predict when the next reversal will occur
We are currently in an unusually long normal polarity interval (Brunhes — 780,000 years); the average Brunhes-era interval is ~200,000–300,000 years

3.2 Implications for Technology-Dependent Civilization

Vulnerability	Risk
Satellites	Increased energetic particle flux → accelerated degradation of solar panels, electronics; more single-event upsets
Power grids	During geomagnetic storms (already a risk), a weakened background field would allow stronger ground-level effects; potential for widespread transformer damage (compare: 1989 Quebec blackout, Carrington Event 1859)
Aviation	Increased cosmic radiation exposure for aircrew and passengers, especially on polar routes
Communications	Ionospheric disruption; potential HF radio blackouts
Navigation	GPS is unaffected (not magnetically dependent), but magnetic compasses would become unreliable during a reversal
Biological	Increased UV radiation if ozone depleted; potential effects on organisms that use magnetic navigation (birds, sea turtles, cetaceans)

A full reversal today would be unprecedented in human technological history — all previous reversals occurred before modern civilization
The transition period (1,000–10,000 years) would provide time for adaptation — this is not a sudden event
However, even the current weakening (South Atlantic Anomaly) already causes measurable satellite and radiation effects

3.3 Magnetic Reversals and Mass Extinctions

Multiple studies have searched for statistical correlations between reversal frequency and extinction events
Some weak correlations have been reported (e.g., periods of frequent reversals coinciding with elevated extinction rates) but none are statistically robust
The Cretaceous Normal Superchron (~84–124 million years ago) — a 40-million-year period with no reversals — did not produce notably lower extinction rates
Current consensus: magnetic reversals alone are not sufficient to cause mass extinctions, but may act as amplifying stressors in combination with other factors

4. DUBIOUS CLAIMS (Tier 4 — No Credible Source)

4.1 Imminent Pole Shift / Catastrophic Flip

Popular media and doomsday sources often claim a "pole shift" is imminent and will cause earthquakes, tsunamis, and civilizational collapse within years
This conflates magnetic pole reversal (gradual, 1,000–10,000 years) with geographic pole shift (physically impossible on short timescales — Earth's rotational axis is extremely stable)
Charles Hapgood's "Earth crust displacement" theory (endorsed by Einstein, but before plate tectonics was understood) is sometimes invoked — this describes crustal movement, not magnetic reversal, and is not supported by modern geophysics

4.2 Ancient Civilizations Had Reversal Technology

Claims that ancient or extraterrestrial civilizations could control Earth's magnetic field have no supporting evidence whatsoever
The energy required to influence the geodynamo is astronomical — comparable to the entire rotational kinetic energy of Earth's core
These are fringe claims with no basis in physics

4.3 2012 Doomsday / Reversal Prophecy

The 2012 "Mayan apocalypse" was sometimes linked to a claimed imminent magnetic reversal
No reversal occurred; no reversal was imminent; the Maya Long Count calendar end-date had no geophysical significance
This is entirely a modern pop-culture phenomenon

IMAGES

#	Description	Filename	Source	License
1	Geomagnetic polarity timescale (last 5 million years)	—	Gradstein et al. (2012)	Fair Use
2	South Atlantic Anomaly map (magnetic field intensity)	—	ESA/Swarm mission	CC BY-SA
3	Cosmogenic ¹⁰Be record showing Laschamp spike	—	Raisbeck et al. (2017)	Fair Use

Counter-Arguments & Criticisms

No significant counter-arguments exist in the scholarly literature for the core claims presented here. The topic of Magnetic Pole Reversals Laschamp represents established knowledge within cataclysm events and historical chronology with no active scholarly dispute over the fundamental claims presented in this document.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Cooper, A., et al. . , 371(6531) | 2021 | "A Global Environmental Crisis 42,000 Years Ago" | Science | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Channell, J | 2017 | "Complexity in Brunhes-Age Millennial-Scale Geomagnetic Excursions" | Earth-Science Reviews | ∅ | ∅ | E | ∅ | | ∅ | ∅ | T. . , 171
Raisbeck, G | 2017 | "An Improved North-South Synchronization of Ice Core Records Around the 41 kyr ¹⁰Be Peak" | Climate of the Past | ∅ | ∅ | M., et al. . , 13 | ∅ | doi:10.5194/cp-2016-79-rc2, isbn:9780404162153 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Bonhommet, N.; Babkine, J. . , 264 | 1967 | "Sur la présence d'aimantations inversées dans la Chaîne des Puys" | Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.3406/crai.1991.15051 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Laj, C.; Channell, J | 2015 | "Geomagnetic Excursions" | Treatise on Geophysics | ∅ | ∅ | E | 2nd | doi:10.1016/b978-044452748-6.00095-x | ∅ | ∅ | T; In , ., Vol; 5; Elsevier
Valet, J.-P.; Fournier, A. . , 54(2) | 2016 | "Deciphering Records of Geomagnetic Reversals" | Reviews of Geophysics | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1002/2015rg000506 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Worm, H.-U. . , 147 | 1997 | "A Link Between Geomagnetic Reversals and Events and Glaciations" | Earth and Planetary Science Letters | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(97)00008-3 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Glassmeier, K.-H.; Vogt, J. . , 155 | 2010 | "Magnetic Polarity Transitions and Biospheric Effects" | Space Science Reviews | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Pavón-Carrasco, F | 2016 | "The South Atlantic Anomaly: The Key for a Possible Geomagnetic Reversal" | Frontiers in Earth Science | ∅ | ∅ | J., & De Santis, A. . , 4 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Tarduno, J | 2015 | "Antiquity of the South Atlantic Anomaly and Evidence for Top-Down Control on the Geodynamo" | Nature Communications | ∅ | ∅ | A., et al. . , 6 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Hapgood, C | 1958 | ∅ | Earth's Shifting Crust | ∅ | ∅ | H. | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | Pantheon Books
Vine, F | 1963 | "Magnetic Anomalies Over Oceanic Ridges" | Nature | ∅ | ∅ | J., & Matthews, D | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | H. . , 199
Coe, R | 1995 | "New Evidence for Extraordinarily Rapid Change of the Geomagnetic Field During a Reversal" | Nature | ∅ | ∅ | S., Prévot, M., & Camps, P. . , 374 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Brunhes, B. . , 5, 705 724 | 1906 | "Recherches sur la direction d'aimantation des roches volcaniques" | Journal de Physique Théorique et Appliquée | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Matuyama, M. . , 5, 203 205 | 1929 | "On the Direction of Magnetisation of Basalt in Japan, Tyôsen and Manchuria" | Proceedings, Imperial Academy of Japan | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Glatzmaier, G | 1995 | "A Three-Dimensional Self-Consistent Computer Simulation of a Geomagnetic Field Reversal" | Nature | ∅ | ∅ | A., & Roberts, P | ∅ | doi:10.1038/377203a0 | ∅ | ∅ | H. . , 377, 203 209
Merrill, R | 1996 | ∅ | The Magnetic Field of the Earth | ∅ | ∅ | T., McElhinny, M | ∅ | doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(96)80001-5 | ∅ | ∅ | W., & McFadden, P; L. ; Academic Press
Channell, J | 2002 | "Geomagnetic Paleointensity and Directional Secular Variation at ODP Site 984" | Journal of Geophysical Research | ∅ | ∅ | E | ∅ | doi:10.1029/1999jb900223 | ∅ | ∅ | T., et al. . , 107(B6), 2114
Cande, S | 1995 | "Revised Calibration of the Geomagnetic Polarity Timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic" | Journal of Geophysical Research | ∅ | ∅ | C., & Kent, D | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | V. . , 100(B4), 6093 6095
Hulot, G., et al | 2015 | "The Present and Future Geomagnetic Field" | Treatise on Geophysics | ∅ | ∅ | In , Vol | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | 5, 33 78
Olson, P.; Amit, H. . , 93, 519 542 | 2006 | "Changes in Earth's Dipole" | Naturwissenschaften | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | isbn:9783642943003 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Gubbins, D. . , 326, 167 169 | 1987 | "Mechanism for Geomagnetic Polarity Reversals" | Nature | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Constable, C | 2006 | "Is Earth's Magnetic Field Reversing?" | Earth and Planetary Science Letters | ∅ | ∅ | G., & Korte, M. . , 246, 1 16 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
Constable, C | 2003 | "Geomagnetic Reversals: Rates, Timescales, Preferred Paths, Statistical Models, and Simulations" | Earth's Core and Lower Mantle | ∅ | ∅ | G | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | In , Taylor & Francis, 77 99
Turney, C | 2020 | "Earth's Magnetic Field — Switching the Lights On" | Reviews of Geophysics | ∅ | ∅ | S | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | M., et al. . , 58, e2020RG000684
Glatzmaier, Gary A.. | ∅ | ∅ | Geodynamo: Numerical Simulations | ∅ | ∅ | Springer Netherlands | ∅ | doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_111 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

Related Doc	Connection
E_4_03 — Paleomagnetism	Detailed paleomagnetic methods and excursion catalog
O_1_02 — Magnetosphere	Earth's magnetic field structure and protective role
R_1_03 — Mass Extinction	Potential (weak) link between reversals and extinctions
R_2_03 — Neanderthal	Laschamp–Neanderthal extinction correlation (Adams Event)
S_4_01 — Existential Risk	Geomagnetic reversal as potential technological risk
E_1_01 — Younger Dryas	Near-contemporary climate event (~12,800 BP)

Consolidated from 25 sources. Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

⚠️ AI-Assisted Research Disclaimer

This document was generated and structured with the assistance of AI tools.

While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, AI-assisted content may

contain errors, misattributions, or unintended inaccuracies. Always verify claims, dates, and sources independently before citing or relying

on any information presented here.

Sources may contain errors. Bibliography entries and cross-references

are checked by automated systems, but mistakes can occur. If something

looks wrong, it may be.

Speculative and unverified claims are clearly labeled. This project

uses a four-tier evidence system:

Tier 1 — Verified: Peer-reviewed, established scientific consensus.
Tier 2 — Credible: Academically supported, debated but grounded.
Tier 3 — Speculative: Plausible but unverified by mainstream science.
Tier 4 — Dubious: No credible support or contradicted by evidence.
This project maps multiple perspectives — not a single truth. Mainstream,

alternative, and skeptical viewpoints are presented side by side for

critical comparison, not endorsement. Inclusion does not imply agreement.

We are actively improving. Source verification, factuality scoring,

and bibliography enrichment are ongoing. Each revision adds stronger

citations, corrects identified errors, and expands coverage.

📖 For full details on our verification methodology, scoring systems, and

quality metrics, see: Fact-Checking & Verification Systems

Think Openly. Check the sources. Draw your own conclusions.

Corrections

Document header date — restored to Feb 28, 2026. The header read 2026-03-13 28, 2026: an ISO date had been written over the month name, leaving the day and year. Recovered from this document's own footer line, which preserves Feb 28, 2026 and whose day and year already agreed with the header remnant. No date was guessed. Corpus hygiene campaign, Phase 4, 2026-07-29.
2 truncated DOIs in the bibliography reassembled — Elsevier identifiers of the form 10.1016/0004-6981(72)90076-5 contain a parenthesised year, and an upstream parse treated the opening bracket as a field break: each DOI was cut short and its tail ()90076-5) left stranded in a neighbouring column. The two halves were rejoined from this same line — each was then confirmed to resolve against Crossref before being written, so no identifier was reconstructed on faith. Repaired: 10.1016/s0012-821x(97)00008-3, 10.1016/s0074-6142(96)80001-5. Corpus hygiene campaign, Phase 4, 2026-07-29.

Earth-Science Reviews — invalid ISBN 9780138008307 removed. No verified replacement could be found, and supplying an unverified number would be worse than none. The entry's author, title, publisher and year are unchanged.

← All Research ← E