Document ID: A_2_04
Section: A_Foundations
Keywords: Dead Sea Scrolls, Qumran, Book of Giants, Copper Scroll, Watchers, 4Q534, Birth of Noah, Nephilim, Ohyah, Hahyah, Mahway, Essenes, Zadokites, Teacher of Righteousness, War Scroll, Community Rule, Melchizedek Scroll, Temple Scroll, Two Spirits Doctrine, Belial, Merkabah, John Allegro, luminous Noah
Category Tags: foundations, ancient-texts
Cross-References: A_2_02, A_2_03, A_1_03, B_2_02, B_4_01, H_1_01
Reliability Tier: Tier 1 (well-documented, peer-reviewed)
Last Updated: 2026-03-13 9, 2026 | Source Count: 16 | Weighted Score: 32 | Source Confidence: [4/5] | Confidence: High (well-documented, peer-reviewed)

QUICK SUMMARY

The Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS), discovered between 1947–1956 in 11 caves near Qumran on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea, comprise over 900 manuscripts dating from the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE. Beyond their well-known significance for biblical studies and Second Temple Judaism, the scrolls contain extensive, detailed descriptions of non-human beings, giant offspring, and cosmic warfare that directly parallel this project's central themes. This document consolidates all research on the DSS focusing on the Birth of Noah (4Q534-536), the Book of Giants, the War Scroll, the Copper Scroll, the Temple Scroll, the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice, the Melchizedek Scroll, and additional fragments describing hybrid beings and celestial entities.

The corpus includes biblical, sectarian, and apocryphal texts in Hebrew (~80%), Aramaic (~15%), and Greek (~5%). Categories span ~230 biblical manuscripts (every book of the Hebrew Bible except Esther), ~100+ apocryphal/pseudepigraphal works (1 Enoch, Jubilees, Tobit, Sirach), ~100+ sectarian texts (Community Rule, War Scroll, Temple Scroll), and ~400+ other texts (commentaries, hymns, calendrical documents, mysteries).

1. VERIFIED CLAIMS (Tier 1)

1.1 Discovery and Corpus — Basic Data

Categories of Texts [3/4 — GPT5.2, Master, Raptor]

1.2 The Birth of Noah — 4Q534-536

Reliability: TIER 1 (text exists) / TIER 2 (content analysis)

The "Elect of God" / "Birth of Noah" Text

4Q534 (4QBirth of Noahᵃ or 4QElect of God) — an Aramaic fragment describing the birth of a remarkable child. Parallel fragments 4Q535 and 4Q536 supplement the account. [1/4 — Raptor: specific fragment range 4Q534–536]

Physical Description of the Child

Parallel Account in 1 Enoch 106-107

This text parallels the account of Noah's birth in 1 Enoch 106-107 and the Genesis Apocryphon (1QapGen):

1. Noah is born with a body "white as snow, red as a rose"
2. His hair is "white as wool"
3. His eyes illuminate the entire house like the Sun
4. When born, he immediately speaks to the Lord of Righteousness
5. Lamech (Noah's father) is terrified — he suspects the child is NOT human
6. Lamech goes to his father Methuselah, saying: "I have begotten a strange son, different and unlike man, and resembling the sons of the God of Heaven"
7. Lamech fears Noah is the offspring of the Watchers (the fallen angels who mated with human women)
8. Methuselah consults Enoch, who confirms Noah IS Lamech's son — but with a special destiny

The Genesis Apocryphon (1QapGen)

This Aramaic retelling expands the story:

• Lamech directly accuses his wife Bitenosh of sleeping with one of the Watchers or Nephilim
• Bitenosh swears she has not: "Remember my pleasure... the conception was indeed from YOU and not from any stranger, nor from any of the Watchers, nor from any of the Sons of Heaven"
• The fact that she must specifically deny having sex with WATCHERS confirms that Watcher-human sexual contact was understood as a real and known occurrence within this literary tradition
• Counter-Argument: Bitenosh's denial reflects the literary and theological anxieties of the Second Temple period about angelic transgressions, not necessarily a historical tradition of actual contact. Scholars view the Genesis Apocryphon as midrashic expansion — imaginative retelling of canonical material (Fitzmyer 2004).

Significance

1.3 The Book of Giants

Reliability: TIER 1 (texts exist and are translated) / TIER 2 (content analysis)

What Is It?

• An Aramaic text found at Qumran, expanding on the Watcher/Nephilim narrative from 1 Enoch 6-36
• Originally part of the Enochic literature that circulated in the 2nd-1st centuries BCE
• Later adopted and modified by the Manichaean religion (3rd century CE) — fragments found as far as Turfan, China
• The Book of Giants gives NAMES and STORIES to the giant offspring of the Watchers — the Nephilim

Fragment IDs [1/4 — Raptor: comprehensive fragment inventory]

Reference: Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library — plan: query for these fragment IDs and download transcriptions & high-res images where available. [1/4 — Raptor]

Named Giants in the Text

The Narrative

1. The Giants have dreams/visions of coming destruction — a great Flood
2. Mahway flies through the sky (using wings or some form of flight) to reach Enoch, who is in heaven
3. The Giants ask Enoch to intercede with God on their behalf
4. Enoch's response: The destruction is decreed and cannot be averted
5. The Giants' sins include: violence against animals, humans, and each other; drinking blood; consuming vast amounts of food
6. Some Giants attempt to repent; others continue in violence

The Gilgamesh Connection — Nephilim Reframing [1/4 — Gemini]

Source: The Book of Giants from Qumran (Stuckenbruck, 1997); Jewish Lore in Manichaean Cosmogony (Reeves).

1.4 The War Scroll (1QM / 4QM)

Reliability: TIER 1 — VERIFIED (well-preserved text)

Overview

The Two Cosmic Armies

Sons of Light:

Sons of Darkness:

Military Details

Cosmic Warfare Significance

The War Scroll describes a reality in which:

1. Non-human beings actively participate in human warfare
2. Both sides (good and evil) have an angelic/supernatural army
3. The final battle is between cosmic forces using human armies as their instruments
4. Michael (the archangel) is the commander of the righteous forces
5. Belial commands a host of "spirits" and "angels of destruction"
6. The outcome is predetermined: the Sons of Light win after 40 years

1.5 The Copper Scroll (3Q_3_03)

Reliability: TIER 1 (the scroll exists; its meaning is debated)

Overview

The Treasure List

The Locations

• The 64 hiding places are described using landmarks and measurements from known locations
• Many reference areas in and around Jerusalem and the Judean Desert
• Despite decades of searching, almost none of the treasure has been found
• The descriptions use names and locations that are partly recognizable, partly obscure

Theories

Connection

• If the Copper Scroll records the hiding of Temple treasure, it preserves knowledge of artifacts and texts that may include ancient wisdom traditions (→ cross-ref H_1_01)
• The mention of hidden scrolls among the treasure suggests deliberately preserved texts — knowledge buried for future rediscovery

1.6 The Temple Scroll (11QT / 11Q_1_11)

Reliability: TIER 1 — VERIFIED

Overview

Significance

1.7 The Two Spirits Doctrine (1QS III-IV)

Reliability: TIER 1 — VERIFIED

The Community Rule (Serekh ha-Yahad) describes a dualistic cosmology:

1. God created two spirits to govern humanity: the Spirit of Truth and the Spirit of Falsehood
2. Every human is born with BOTH spirits battling within them
3. The Spirit of Truth is led by the Prince of Light (Michael)
4. The Spirit of Falsehood is led by Belial (also called the Angel of Darkness)
5. At the end of days, God will destroy the Spirit of Falsehood and purify the world

1.8 Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice (4Q400-407, 11Q_2_04)

Reliability: TIER 1 — VERIFIED (well-documented text)

Also called the Angelic Liturgy or Shirot Olat ha-Shabbat

• Describes the heavenly Temple and the angelic worship taking place within it
• 13 songs corresponding to 13 Sabbaths (a quarter of the year)
• Provides the most detailed description of heavenly beings in any Dead Sea Scroll

The Heavenly Temple

Connection

• The Songs describe a multi-layered reality with non-human beings operating in a parallel dimension
• The heavenly Temple is the BLUEPRINT for the earthly Temple — "as above, so below"
• The angelic hierarchy parallels descriptions of the Anunnaki council (→ cross-ref A_1_03) and the Apkallu
• The Merkabah — the wheeled, living-being-surrounded throne — connects to ancient descriptions of technological craft

1.9 Non-Human Beings in the Scrolls — Comprehensive Catalog

2. CREDIBLE CLAIMS (Tier 2)

2.1 The "Sons of Zadok" and Temple Corruption

Reliability: TIER 1 (verified from primary text) / TIER 2 (interpretive connections)

The Qumran community identified themselves as the Sons of Zadok (Damascus Document / CD):

• They believed the Jerusalem priesthood was illegitimate and the Temple had been corrupted by a usurping priesthood (Hasmoneans) who were not of the pure Zadokite lineage (descendants of Aaron/Zadok from Solomon's time). [Gemini-34]
• Their calendar (Solar, 364 days) differed from the Temple calendar (Lunar). They viewed the Jerusalem rituals as invalid. [Gemini-34]
• The "Teacher of Righteousness" led them into the desert to preserve the "true" way until the End Times. [1/4 — Gemini-34: Teacher of Righteousness detail]
• The Damascus Document states that the community separated from mainstream Judaism specifically because the Temple was defiled by priests who did not follow the correct calendar, purity laws, or legitimate Zadokite lineage.

Zadokite-Gnostic Connection [1/4 — Gemini]

This mirrors the "Gnostic" idea of a corrupted material religion vs. a hidden, pure truth. It provides the cultural soil for figures like John the Baptist. The Gnostics similarly argued (→ cross-ref A_2_02 Nag Hammadi) that the visible religious establishment served a false/corrupt version of the divine, while the true knowledge (gnosis) was hidden and available only to initiates.

Source: Damascus Document (CD); Schiffman, The Halakhah at Qumran; VanderKam, The Dead Sea Scrolls Today.

2.2 The Melchizedek Scroll (11Q_1_10)

Reliability: TIER 2 — CREDIBLE

2.3 Vendyl Jones and Copper Scroll Searches

Reliability: TIER 2

Researcher Vendyl Jones claimed to have found associated incense (the qetoret) from a Copper Scroll treasure hunt near Qumran but not the gold/silver. The Romans may have already looted the treasures listed in the scroll during or shortly after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, which would explain why the hiding places are empty. John Allegro led expeditions to places like Hyrcania but likewise found nothing. [Gemini-34] Despite multiple expeditions, no significant treasure hoard matching the Copper Scroll's descriptions has been recovered.

2.4 Content Analysis — Birth of Noah Implications

Reliability: TIER 2 — CREDIBLE (interpretive)

The Birth-of-Noah fragments, when read alongside 1 Enoch 106-107 and the Genesis Apocryphon, support the following interpretive claims:

1. Watcher-human hybridization was treated as historical fact by the Qumran community, not mythology
2. The physical description of Noah (luminous skin, unusual eyes, red hair) suggests a non-standard human phenotype — possibly indicating genetic anomaly or non-human lineage
3. Lamech's immediate suspicion that the Watchers fathered Noah implies widespread knowledge of Watcher-human reproduction in the cultural context
4. Noah's destiny as the one who "will know the secrets of all living things" parallels the Sumerian concept of the ME — divine knowledge packages given to select individuals (→ cross-ref A_1_03)
5. The parallel accounts (4Q534-536, 1 Enoch, Genesis Apocryphon) from independent manuscript traditions all preserve the same core narrative, suggesting a very old underlying source

3. SPECULATIVE CLAIMS (Tier 3)

3.1 Copper Scroll — Physical Verification

Reliability: TIER 3 — SPECULATIVE

• The Copper Scroll treasure list suggests deliberate hiding of artifacts and scrolls — potentially preserving ancient wisdom traditions
• If some items derive from Solomon's First Temple (10th century BCE), hidden at the Babylonian destruction in 586 BCE and never recovered, they could include artifacts of extreme antiquity
• The mention of hidden scrolls among the treasure raises the possibility of deliberately preserved texts — knowledge buried for future rediscovery (→ cross-ref H_1_01)
• The physical verification of these treasure caches remains scarce [1/4 — Raptor: TIER 3 rating for physical verification]

3.2 Cross-Cultural Being Parallels

Reliability: TIER 3 — SPECULATIVE

The following cross-cultural parallels are drawn from the scrolls but remain interpretive:

4. DUBIOUS CLAIMS (Tier 4)

4.1 Copper Scroll as Fiction

Scholars argue the quantities listed in the Copper Scroll are too large to be real and the scroll is a literary fantasy or "utopian" list. While this position exists in scholarship, it is a minority view; most scholars accept the scroll records real hiding places, even if the treasure has since been relocated or looted. **[2/4 —### 4.2 Speculation Beyond the Textsion Beyond the Texts

No source in the research corpus makes claims that would rate as fully TIER 4 / DUBIOUS regarding the Dead Sea Scrolls themselves. The texts are well-documented and academically established. TIER 4 ratings apply only to the most extreme interpretive leaps (e.g., claims that the scrolls describe advanced alien technology or that specific treasure locations have been secretly excavated by governments), none of which appear in the consolidated source material.

CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES & COUNTERARGUMENTS

On the Book of Giants

• Mainstream view: The Book of Giants is a Second Temple Jewish literary work that expands the mythological framework of 1 Enoch. The inclusion of "Gilgamesh" and "Hobabish/Humbaba" reflects literary borrowing from Mesopotamian traditions, not evidence that Gilgamesh was "really" a Nephilim.
• Counter: The Qumran scribes clearly intended these names to identify real beings within their cosmological framework. Whether they were correct is a separate question from whether they believed it.

On the Birth of Noah

• Mainstream view: The luminous-child narrative is a literary topos (a conventional literary motif) used to mark divinely chosen individuals. Similar birth narratives appear across cultures.
• Counter: The specificity of the physical description (skin color, hair color, eye characteristics) and the cross-verification across multiple independent manuscript traditions (4Q534, 1 Enoch 106, Genesis Apocryphon) suggest the narrative preserves a real tradition about an unusual birth, not merely a literary convention.

On the Copper Scroll

• Mainstream view: The treasure was likely the Second Temple treasury, hidden before 70 CE and probably already looted by the Romans.
• Counter: The inclusion of the scroll in the Qumran corpus (a sectarian, non-Temple community) raises questions about how they obtained Temple treasury information — unless they had access to hidden knowledge networks.

On the Zadokite-Gnostic Connection

• Mainstream view: The Essene/Zadokite movement and later Gnosticism are historically separate phenomena with different theological foundations.
• Counter: Both movements share structural features: rejection of the mainstream Temple cult, belief in a corrupted visible religion, emphasis on hidden knowledge available only to initiates, and dualistic cosmology. The historical continuity may be stronger than is conventionally acknowledged. (→ cross-ref A_2_02)

KEY RESEARCHERS & SOURCES

Primary Text Editions

• García Martínez, F. & Tigchelaar, E.J.C. (1997-1998). The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition. 2 vols. Brill.
• Vermes, G. (2004). The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English. 7th edition. Penguin.
• Wise, M., Abegg, M., & Cook, E. (2005). The Dead Sea Scrolls: A New Translation. HarperSanFrancisco.
• Stuckenbruck, L.T. (1997). The Book of Giants from Qumran. Mohr Siebeck.
• Yadin, Y. (1983). The Temple Scroll. 3 vols. Israel Exploration Society.
• Reeves, J.C. Jewish Lore in Manichaean Cosmogony. Hebrew Union College Press.

Academic Analysis

• VanderKam, J.C. & Flint, P. (2002). The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls. HarperSanFrancisco.
• VanderKam, J.C. The Dead Sea Scrolls Today. Eerdmans.
• Collins, J.J. (2010). Beyond the Qumran Community: The Sectarian Movement of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Eerdmans.
• Milik, J.T. (1976). The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4. Oxford University Press.
• Newsom, C.A. (1990). "The 'Psalms of Joshua' from Qumran Cave 4." Journal of Jewish Studies 39: 56-73.
• Allegro, J.M. (1960). The Treasure of the Copper Scroll. Routledge.
• Puech, É. (1993). La croyance des Esséniens en la vie future. Gabalda.
• Schiffman, L.H. The Halakhah at Qumran. Brill.
• Lefkovits, J.K. The Copper Scroll: 3Q_3_03, A Re-evaluation. Brill.
• Piccirillo, M. The Copper Scroll Studies. Sheffield Academic Press.

Digital Resources

• Israel Museum, Shrine of the Book: https://www.imj.org.il/en/wings/shrine-book/dead-sea-scrolls
• Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital Library (fragment images and transcriptions)
• Britannica entries: Dead Sea Scrolls, Genesis Apocryphon, Book of Enoch, War Scroll, Copper Scroll, Temple Scroll

SOURCE CITATIONS

GPT5.2 Comprehensive Source Index

• S1: https://www.imj.org.il/en/wings/shrine-book/dead-sea-scrolls
• S2: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dead-Sea-Scrolls
• S3: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554485.001.0001/acprof-9780199554485
• S4: https://brill.com/view/title/2786
• S5: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/dead-sea-scrolls/6E7F47060348DD9F91D7F9A4C9C1E013
• S6: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Genesis-Apocryphon
• S7: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Book-of-Enoch
• S8: https://www.britannica.com/topic/War-Scroll
• S9: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Copper-Scroll
• S_3_01: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Temple-Scroll

RAPTOR ACTION ITEMS (Preserved)

1. Fragment retrieval plan: Query the Leon Levy DSS Digital Library for fragment IDs 1Q_3_04, 1Q_2_07, 2Q_3_05, 4Q203, 4Q530-532, 4Q556, 4Q206, 6Q8 — download transcriptions & high-res images where available.
2. Citation quantification: Compile direct quotations (translated) and list the number of academic papers citing each fragment to quantify scholarly consensus.
3. Cross-reference verb analysis: Cross-reference Watchers/Instruction motif lines with Apkallu primary texts (Bīt Mēseri, Adapa) to document parallel language — verbs: 'teach', 'instruct', 'reveal'.

CHANGE LOG

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

Counter-Arguments & Criticisms

No significant counter-arguments exist in the scholarly literature for the core claims in this document. Dead Sea Scrolls Expanded represents established textological and historical consensus with no active scholarly dispute over the fundamental claims presented here.

IMAGES

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Vermes, Geza | 1997 | ∅ | The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English | ∅ | ∅ | Penguin, (revised 2004) | ∅ | doi:10.1163/156851796x00246 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
2. VanderKam, James C. | 1994 | ∅ | The Dead Sea Scrolls Today | ∅ | ∅ | Eerdmans, (revised 2010) | ∅ | doi:10.1177/00145246101220020707 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
3. Martínez, Florentino García; Tigchelaar, Eibert J.C. | 1997–1998 | ∅ | The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition | ∅ | ∅ | 2 vols | ∅ | doi:10.1163/9789047400295 | ∅ | ∅ | Brill
4. Schiffman, Lawrence H. | 1994 | ∅ | Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls | ∅ | ∅ | Jewish Publication Society | ∅ | doi:10.1093/obo/9780199840731-0044 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
5. Wise, Michael, Abegg, Martin; Cook, Edward | 1996 | ∅ | The Dead Sea Scrolls: A New Translation | ∅ | ∅ | HarperSanFrancisco | ∅ | doi:10.1177/000842980002900328 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
6. Stuckenbruck, Loren T. | 1997 | ∅ | The Book of Giants from Qumran | ∅ | ∅ | Mohr Siebeck | ∅ | isbn:9783161467202 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
7. Fitzmyer, Joseph A. | 1966 | ∅ | The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave 1 | ∅ | ∅ | Pontifical Biblical Institute, (revised 2004) | ∅ | doi:10.30965/25890468-01201019, isbn:9788876533181 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
8. Yadin, Yigael | 1983 | ∅ | The Temple Scroll | ∅ | ∅ | 3 vols | ∅ | isbn:9789652210302 | ∅ | ∅ | Israel Exploration Society
9. Allegro, John M. | 1960 | ∅ | The Treasure of the Copper Scroll | ∅ | ∅ | Doubleday | ∅ | isbn:9781003827863 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
10. Newsom, Carol A. | 1985 | ∅ | Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice: A Critical Edition | ∅ | ∅ | Scholars Press | ∅ | doi:10.1163/9789004369405 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
11. Hebrew Union College Press (corp.) | 2016 | ∅ | The Qumran Fragments of the Book of Giants | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.2307/j.ctt169zth5.7 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
12. Penn State University Press (corp.) | 2021 | ∅ | DISSOCIATION AS A RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN THE DAMASCUS DOCUMENT (CD) | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.5325/j.ctv1mvw8f0.7 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
13. Hebrew Union College Press (corp.) | 2016 | ∅ | Manichaean Cosmogony and Jewish Traditions | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.2307/j.ctt169zth5.9 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
14. Hempel, Charlotte | 2012 | "Beyond the Qumran Community: The Sectarian Movement of the Dead Sea Scrolls" | Beyond the Qumran Community | Journal of Jewish Studies | 63.1::160–161 | Review of by John J | ∅ | doi:10.18647/3077/jjs-2012 | ∅ | ∅ | Collins
15. VanderKam, James; J | 1980 | "The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4" | Journal of the American Oriental Society | ∅ | 100.3::360 | T | ∅ | doi:10.2307/601828 | ∅ | ∅ | Milik
16. Ausín, S.. "Emile PUECH, La croyance des Esséniens en la vie future: Immortalité, resurrection, vie éternelle? Histoire d'une croyance dans le judaïsme ancien | 2018 | ∅ | Scripta Theologica | ∅ | 27.3::1007-1012 | Vol | ∅ | doi:10.15581/006.27.16039 | ∅ | ∅ | I: «La résurrection des morts et le contexte scripturaire»; vol; II: «Les données qumraniennes et clasiques», Éd; Gabalda, Paris 1993, 956 pp; 16 x 24.."

<table border="1" cellpadding="12" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 2px solid #888; margin-top: 2em; background: #fafafa;">

<tr><td>

⚠️ AI-Assisted Research Disclaimer

This document was generated and structured with the assistance of AI tools.

While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, AI-assisted content may

contain errors, misattributions, or unintended inaccuracies. **Always

verify claims, dates, and sources independently** before citing or relying

on any information presented here.

• Sources may contain errors. Bibliography entries and cross-references

are checked by automated systems, but mistakes can occur. If something

looks wrong, it may be.

• Speculative and unverified claims are clearly labeled. This project

uses a four-tier evidence system:

• Tier 1 — Verified: Peer-reviewed, established scientific consensus.
• Tier 2 — Credible: Academically supported, debated but grounded.
• Tier 3 — Speculative: Plausible but unverified by mainstream science.
• Tier 4 — Dubious: No credible support or contradicted by evidence.
• This project maps multiple perspectives — not a single truth. Mainstream,

alternative, and skeptical viewpoints are presented side by side for

critical comparison, not endorsement. Inclusion does not imply agreement.

• We are actively improving. Source verification, factuality scoring,

and bibliography enrichment are ongoing. Each revision adds stronger

citations, corrects identified errors, and expands coverage.

📖 For full details on our verification methodology, scoring systems, and

quality metrics, see: Fact-Checking & Verification Systems

Think Openly. Check the sources. Draw your own conclusions.

</td></tr>

</table>