Document ID: S_1_06
Section: S_Future_Technology
Keywords: internet, ARPANET, TCP/IP, World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, Vint Cerf, Bob Kahn, social media, ICANN, deep web, dark web, Tor, attention economy, platform monopoly, network effects, blockchain, Web3, digital divide, digital preservation, AI-generated content, misinformation, Section 230, net neutrality
Category Tags: future-technology
Cross-References: ZD_1_02 · K_4_12 · G_4_07 · S_5_02 · V_1_02
Reliability Tier: Tier 1-3 (ranges from documented internet history and technical specifications to speculative Web3 and AI-mediated futures)
Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026 | Source Count: 23 | Weighted Score: 36 | Source Confidence: [4/5] | Confidence: High (Tier 1-2), Moderate (Tier 3), Low (Tier 4)

QUICK SUMMARY

The internet — humanity's most transformative communication infrastructure — evolved from a U.S. military research network (ARPANET, 1969) through academic adoption, commercialization (1990s), and the World Wide Web (Berners-Lee, 1991) into a global system connecting ~5.3 billion users by 2025. Its technical foundations — packet switching (Baran/Davies), TCP/IP (Cerf/Kahn), DNS, and BGP — remain remarkably stable despite traffic volumes billions of times larger than originally designed for. The social consequences have been revolutionary and ambivalent: the internet enabled unprecedented access to information, commerce, and communication while simultaneously creating platform monopolies (Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft), an attention economy that monetizes human behavior, a misinformation crisis that destabilizes democratic institutions, and a surveillance infrastructure exploited by both states and corporations. The deep web (unindexed content) dwarfs the surface web by orders of magnitude; the dark web (Tor-accessible services) hosts both legitimate privacy tools and criminal marketplaces. Emerging debates center on Web3/blockchain decentralization, AI-generated content flooding information ecosystems, digital preservation of cultural heritage, and the growing global digital divide. The internet's governance through multi-stakeholder organizations (ICANN, IETF, W3C) faces increasing pressure from nation-state fragmentation ("splinternet").

1. VERIFIED CLAIMS (Tier 1 — Documented History / Technical Standards)

1.1 ARPANET and the Origins of Packet Switching (1960s–1970s)

The internet's technical ancestry begins with Cold War-era research into survivable communication networks:

• Paul Baran (RAND, 1964): Proposed distributed, redundant communication networks using "message blocks" — later called "packet switching" — that could survive nuclear attack by routing around destroyed nodes. The concept was independently developed by Donald Davies (UK National Physical Laboratory, 1965), who coined the term "packet switching."
• ARPANET (1969): Funded by DARPA (then ARPA), the first operational packet-switched network. The first message was transmitted on October 29, 1969, between UCLA (Leonard Kleinrock's lab) and Stanford Research Institute. The system crashed after transmitting "LO" of "LOGIN." By 1971, 15 nodes were connected.
• Email (1971): Ray Tomlinson sent the first network email on ARPANET, choosing the "@" symbol to separate user from host — a convention that persists today.
• Key design principles: Decentralized architecture (no single point of failure), packet switching (data divided into discrete packets routed independently), and end-to-end principle (intelligence at the network's edges, not in the core) — principles that shaped the internet's subsequent openness and resilience.

1.2 TCP/IP — The Protocol That Unified Networks (1974–1983)

• Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn (1974): Published "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication" describing TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) — enabling different computer networks to interconnect. TCP was later split into TCP (reliable, ordered delivery) and IP (Internet Protocol, addressing and routing), creating the TCP/IP stack that remains the internet's fundamental protocol.
• "Flag Day" (January 1, 1983): ARPANET switched from NCP (Network Control Program) to TCP/IP — the moment the "internet" as an interconnected network of networks was formally born. This switchover was remarkably smooth despite involving all connected hosts across the network.
• DNS (1983): Paul Mockapetris's Domain Name System replaced manual hostname tables with a hierarchical, distributed naming system — mapping human-readable names (e.g., example.com) to IP addresses. DNS remains one of the internet's most critical infrastructure components.
• BGP (Border Gateway Protocol, 1989): The routing protocol that enables autonomous systems (ISPs, universities, corporations) to exchange routing information and direct traffic across the global internet. BGP's trust-based design — routers accept announced routes without cryptographic verification — creates vulnerabilities that persist today (route hijacking, BGP leaks).

1.3 The World Wide Web (1989–1995)

• Tim Berners-Lee (CERN, 1989): Proposed a hypertext system for sharing research documents. Implemented three foundational technologies: HTML (HyperText Markup Language), HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), and URLs (Uniform Resource Locators). The first website (info.cern.ch) went live on August 6, 1991.
• Critical decision: Berners-Lee and CERN released the Web technology into the public domain (April 30, 1993) — forgoing potential billions in licensing revenue. This decision enabled universal adoption and is widely regarded as one of the most consequential acts of technological altruism in history.
• Mosaic browser (1993): Developed at NCSA (University of Illinois) by Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina — the first graphical web browser with inline image display, making the Web accessible to non-technical users. Andreessen subsequently co-founded Netscape (1994), whose Netscape Navigator dominated early Web browsing and whose IPO (August 9, 1995) catalyzed the dot-com boom.
• Rapid growth: From 130 websites in 1993 to ~100,000 by 1996 to over 1.9 billion websites by 2025 (though only ~400 million are active). The Web transformed from an academic document-sharing system to the primary interface for global commerce, communication, entertainment, and governance.

1.4 Social Media Platforms and Network Effects (2003–Present)

• Timeline: Friendster (2003), MySpace (2003), Facebook (2004, Harvard-only initially, global 2006), Twitter (2006), Instagram (2010), Snapchat (2011), TikTok (2016 as Douyin, international 2017). Each platform leveraged network effects — the value of the platform increases with each additional user — to achieve market dominance.
• Scale (2025): Facebook (~3 billion monthly active users), YouTube (~2.5B), WhatsApp (~2.7B), Instagram (~2B), TikTok (~1.5B), X/Twitter (~550M). These platforms mediate a significant portion of global information exchange, social interaction, and political discourse.
• Business model: "If the product is free, you are the product." Social media platforms generate revenue through targeted advertising based on behavioral profiling — collecting and analyzing user data (clicks, likes, shares, time spent, location, device) to build predictive models of individual preferences, vulnerabilities, and purchasing intent. This creates structural incentives to maximize "engagement" — which algorithmically favors emotionally charged, outrage-inducing, and polarizing content.
• Algorithmic amplification: Platform recommendation algorithms (YouTube's Up Next, Facebook's News Feed, TikTok's For You Page) determine what billions of people see, prioritizing content that maximizes engagement time. Internal Facebook research (the "Facebook Files," WSJ, 2021) showed that the company's own researchers documented that its algorithms amplified divisive content and that Instagram was harmful to teenage girls' mental health — findings that executives chose not to act on publicly.

1.5 Internet Governance — ICANN, IETF, and Multi-stakeholderism

• ICANN (1998): The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers manages the DNS root zone, IP address allocation, and domain name policies. Originally under U.S. Department of Commerce oversight via the IANA contract, ICANN transitioned to independent multi-stakeholder governance in 2016 (IANA Stewardship Transition). This transition was contentious, with some U.S. legislators arguing it ceded American control of a strategic resource.
• IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force): Develops internet technical standards (RFCs — Requests for Comments) through an open, consensus-based process. "Rough consensus and running code" is its decision-making philosophy. The IETF has no formal membership — anyone can participate.
• W3C (World Wide Web Consortium): Founded by Berners-Lee (1994) to develop Web standards (HTML, CSS, accessibility guidelines). Ensures interoperability and open standards.
• "Splinternet" threat: China's Great Firewall, Russia's "sovereign internet" law (2019), and the EU's regulatory divergence (GDPR, DSA, DMA) are fragmenting the previously unified global internet into national or regional intranets with different content, standards, and governance — threatening the internet's founding principle of universal connectivity.

2. CREDIBLE CLAIMS (Tier 2 — Documented / Analyzed / Debated)

2.1 The Deep Web and Dark Web

• Deep web: Content not indexed by search engines — password-protected pages, databases, private intranets, paywalled content, dynamically generated pages. Estimated to be 400–550× larger than the surface web. The deep web is overwhelmingly legitimate (banking portals, email, subscription databases).
• Dark web: Services accessible only through overlay networks like Tor (The Onion Router, originally developed by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory). Tor routes traffic through multiple encrypted relays, obscuring the user's IP address and enabling anonymous access and publication. There are approximately 65,000–80,000 unique .onion addresses.
• Silk Road (2011–2013): The first major dark web marketplace (Ross Ulbricht, "Dread Pirate Roberts"), facilitating drug sales using Bitcoin. Shut down by the FBI (2013); Ulbricht sentenced to life without parole (2015), commuted to time served by President Trump (2025). Successor markets (AlphaBay, Hansa, Hydra) continued the pattern of emergence, growth, and law enforcement takedown.
• Legitimate uses: Tor is used by journalists in authoritarian states, activists, whistleblowers, and ordinary citizens seeking privacy. The Tor Project is funded partly by the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor — creating an ironic tension between U.S. intelligence agencies' desire to break Tor encryption and the diplomatic mission to promote it.
• SecureDrop and press freedom: SecureDrop (developed by Aaron Swartz and Kevin Poulsen, maintained by Freedom of the Press Foundation) enables anonymous document submission to news organizations via Tor. Used by The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Guardian, and 70+ outlets. The dark web serves a critical democratic function enabling confidential communication between sources and journalists.
• Cryptocurrency and anonymity: Bitcoin (pseudonymous, not anonymous) and privacy-focused cryptocurrencies (Monero, Zcash) enable financial transactions resistant to surveillance. Blockchain analysis firms (Chainalysis, Elliptic) have partially de-anonymized Bitcoin transactions, aiding law enforcement — pushing illicit actors toward more privacy-preserving alternatives.
• Dual-use tension: The same anonymity technologies that protect dissidents, journalists, and abuse victims also shield criminal activity. This dual-use nature makes policy responses complex — restricting anonymity tools to combat crime simultaneously undermines press freedom and human rights protection.

2.2 The Attention Economy and Platform Monopolies

• Concept (Herbert Simon, 1971; Tim Wu, 2016): In an information-rich world, the scarce resource is human attention. Platforms compete to capture and monetize attention through addictive design patterns (infinite scroll, autoplay, notifications, variable reward schedules borrowed from slot machine psychology).
• Market concentration: Google controls ~92% of global search, ~70% of mobile OS (Android); Apple controls ~28% of mobile OS (iOS) and operates the dominant app marketplace alongside Google; Meta controls the dominant social networks (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp); Amazon controls ~38% of U.S. e-commerce and ~32% of cloud computing (AWS). This concentration raises antitrust concerns addressed by EU DMA enforcement, U.S. DOJ cases against Google (2020) and Apple (2024), and FTC case against Meta (2020).
• Section 230 (Communications Decency Act, 1996): "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." This legal shield enables platforms to host user content without liability for its accuracy or legality — foundational to the internet's growth but increasingly controversial as platforms exercise editorial judgment through algorithmic amplification.

2.3 Digital Divide

• Global: ~2.6 billion people (33% of humanity) remain offline as of 2024 (ITU). Connectivity correlates strongly with income, geography (urban vs. rural), gender (300 million fewer women online than men globally), age, and disability.
• Meaningful access: Connectivity alone is insufficient — meaningful access requires affordable devices, affordable data, digital literacy, relevant local-language content, and reliable electricity. Many "connected" users access the internet solely through low-bandwidth mobile phones with expensive per-GB data costs.
• COVID-19 impact: The pandemic dramatically exposed the digital divide — remote education, telehealth, and remote work were accessible mainly to those with broadband, devices, and digital skills, widening pre-existing inequalities.

2.4 Misinformation and Information Ecosystems

• Scale: MIT research (Vosoughi et al., Science, 2018) found that false news on Twitter spread "farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth" — false stories were 70% more likely to be retweeted than true stories. The asymmetry is driven by novelty and emotional arousal.
• Platform responsibility: Social media platforms' algorithmic amplification of engagement-maximizing content structurally incentivizes misinformation, conspiracy theories, and emotionally manipulative content. Content moderation at the scale of billions of posts daily remains an unsolved problem combining AI limitations with cultural and linguistic complexity.
• Election interference: Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) operations during the 2016 U.S. presidential election demonstrated the use of social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube) for coordinated inauthentic behavior — creating fake accounts, amplifying divisive content, and organizing real-world events. Mueller investigation (2019) documented the operations in detail.
• Deepfakes and AI-generated disinformation: Advances in generative AI (text, image, audio, video) dramatically lower the cost of producing convincing false content. Synthetic media can fabricate speeches, events, and documents — threatening the evidentiary value of all digital media. Detection tools exist but face an ongoing adversarial arms race with generation technology.

3. SPECULATIVE CLAIMS (Tier 3 — Emerging / Debated)

3.1 Web3 and Blockchain Decentralization

• Vision: "Web3" proposes using blockchain technology, smart contracts, and token-based economics to build a decentralized internet — replacing platform monopolies with user-owned protocols. Proponents envision decentralized social media, finance (DeFi), identity, and storage.
• Reality check: As of 2025, Web3 applications remain niche. Decentralized social media (Mastodon/Fediverse, Bluesky, Lens Protocol) collectively hold <1% of social media users. DeFi suffered ~$3.8 billion in hacks/exploits in 2022. NFT market collapsed >90% from peak. Cryptocurrency market faces regulatory uncertainty globally.
• Criticism: Moxie Marlinspike (Signal founder, 2022) argued that Web3 recentralizes around a few infrastructure providers (Infura, Alchemy, OpenSea) despite decentralized rhetoric. Blockchain scalability limitations (transaction throughput, energy consumption) remain significant.
• Genuine innovation: Blockchain-based identity systems (self-sovereign identity), supply chain transparency, and censorship-resistant publishing have legitimate applications — particularly valuable in authoritarian contexts where centralized platforms can be co-opted.

3.2 AI-Generated Content and the Epistemic Crisis

• Scale: By 2025, AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, Sora) generate text, images, video, and audio at qualities increasingly indistinguishable from human-created content. Estimates suggest AI-generated text constitutes 5–15% of new internet content as of 2025, growing rapidly.
• Dead internet theory: The speculative claim that most internet content and interaction is already generated by bots and AI rather than humans. While exaggerated, the concern reflects a real trend: bot traffic constitutes ~50% of all web traffic (Imperva, 2024), and AI-generated content is proliferating across social media, news aggregators, and e-commerce reviews.
• Epistemic impact: If the information environment is flooded with AI-generated content of unknown provenance, distinguishing truth from fabrication becomes increasingly difficult. Provenance tracking (C2PA content credentials) and AI detection tools exist but face an arms race with generative models.

3.3 Internet of Things (IoT) and Ambient Computing

• Scale: An estimated 15–18 billion IoT devices connected globally by 2025 — smart home devices, industrial sensors, connected vehicles, medical devices, agricultural monitors, wearables. Projected to reach 30+ billion by 2030.
• Security crisis: Many IoT devices ship with default passwords, no encryption, and no update mechanism — creating millions of permanently vulnerable network endpoints. The Mirai botnet (2016) conscripted ~600,000 IoT devices (security cameras, routers) for DDoS attacks that temporarily disabled Twitter, Netflix, Reddit, and other major services.
• Privacy erosion: IoT devices create fine-grained behavioral data about household routines, health, sleep, conversations, and activities. Amazon Echo/Alexa recordings have been subpoenaed in criminal investigations. Smart meter data reveals when residents are home, asleep, cooking, or using specific appliances.

3.4 Digital Preservation Crisis

• Link rot: ~25% of web pages that existed in 2013 are no longer accessible (Pew Research, 2024). ~38% of pages linked from government and legal documents no longer work. The internet is both the most prolific information medium in history and one of the most ephemeral.
• Internet Archive (Wayback Machine): Founded by Brewster Kahle (1996), the Internet Archive preserves >835 billion web pages and serves as the institution of record for the historical web. Its legal status has been challenged; a 2023 court ruling (Hachette v. Internet Archive) restricted its National Emergency Library lending program.
• Format obsolescence: Digital content encoded in proprietary formats, stored on obsolete media (floppy disks, Zip drives, optical discs), or dependent on defunct software faces inaccessibility. The "digital dark age" (Vint Cerf, 2015) describes a scenario where future historians cannot access 21st-century digital records.

4. DUBIOUS CLAIMS (Tier 4 — Unsupported / Conspiratorial)

4.1 "The Internet Was Created for Mind Control"

The internet's military research origins (DARPA) are sometimes cited as evidence that it was designed for population surveillance or mind control. ARPANET was designed for research resource sharing and survivable communications, not surveillance. Its decentralized design actively resists centralized control — which is why governments have struggled to censor or monitor it comprehensively.

4.2 "Social Media Algorithms Are Deliberately Designed to Destroy Democracy"

While platform incentive structures demonstrably amplify divisive content — and internal Facebook documents show awareness of this effect — the claim that algorithms are deliberately designed to undermine democracy conflates structural incentives (engagement maximization for advertising revenue) with intentional political subversion. The problem is systemic, not conspiratorial.

4.3 "Cryptocurrency Will Replace All Government Currency Within a Decade"

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies occupy a significant but niche financial role. As of 2025, total cryptocurrency market capitalization (~$2–3 trillion) represents <2% of global financial assets. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) may incorporate blockchain technology but under government control — the opposite of cryptocurrency's decentralization ethos. El Salvador's Bitcoin legal tender experiment (2021) has been scaled back. Widespread replacement of fiat currency remains unlikely in the foreseeable future.

Counter-Arguments & Criticisms

No significant counter-arguments exist in the scholarly literature for the core claims presented here. The topic of Internet Digital Civilization represents established knowledge within future technology and innovation with no active scholarly dispute over the fundamental claims presented in this document.

IMAGES

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Leiner, B.M., et al. . , 39(5), 22 31 | 2009 | "A Brief History of the Internet" | ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1145/1629607.1629613 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
2. Cerf, V.G.; Kahn, R.E. . , COM-22(5), 637 648 | 1974 | "A Protocol for Packet Network Intercommunication" | IEEE Transactions | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1109/tcom.1974.1092259 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
3. Berners-Lee, T. . | 1999 | ∅ | Weaving the Web | ∅ | ∅ | HarperSanFrancisco | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
4. Zuboff, S. . | 2019 | ∅ | The Age of Surveillance Capitalism | ∅ | ∅ | PublicAffairs | ∅ | doi:10.12957/rmi.2021.55150, isbn:9781610395694 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
5. Wu, T. . | 2016 | ∅ | The Attention Merchants | ∅ | ∅ | Knopf | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
6. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D.; Aral, S. . , 359(6380), 1146 1151 | 2018 | "The spread of true and false news online" | Science | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
7. Baran, P. | 1964 | "On Distributed Communications: Introduction to Distributed Communications Networks" | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | RAND RM-3420-PR | ∅ | doi:10.7249/rm3420 | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
8. Abbate, J. . | 1999 | ∅ | Inventing the Internet | ∅ | ∅ | MIT Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
9. Mueller, R.S. . | 2019 | ∅ | Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election | ∅ | ∅ | U.S | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | DOJ
10. Hafner, K.; Lyon, M. . | 1996 | ∅ | Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet | ∅ | ∅ | Simon & Schuster | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
11. ITU . (corp.) | 2024 | ∅ | Facts and Figures 2024: Internet Use | ∅ | ∅ | International Telecommunication Union | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
12. Pew Research Center | 2024 | "When Online Content Disappears" | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | Pew Research | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
13. Berners-Lee, T. . , 303(6), 80 85 | 2010 | "Long Live the Web" | Scientific American | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
14. Marlinspike, M. . moxie.org | 2022 | "My First Impressions of Web3" | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
15. O'Neil, C. . | 2016 | ∅ | Weapons of Math Destruction | ∅ | ∅ | Crown | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
16. Zittrain, J. . | 2008 | ∅ | The Future of the Internet — And How to Stop It | ∅ | ∅ | Yale University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
17. Lessig, L. . | 2006 | ∅ | Code: Version 2.0 | ∅ | ∅ | Basic Books | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
18. Morozov, E. . | 2011 | ∅ | The Net Delusion | ∅ | ∅ | PublicAffairs | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
19. Pariser, E. . | 2011 | ∅ | The Filter Bubble | ∅ | ∅ | Penguin | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
20. Floridi, L. . | 2014 | ∅ | The Fourth Revolution | ∅ | ∅ | Oxford University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
21. DeNardis, L. . | 2014 | ∅ | The Global War for Internet Governance | ∅ | ∅ | Yale University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
22. Hindman, M. . | 2018 | ∅ | The Internet Trap | ∅ | ∅ | Princeton University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅
23. Van Dijck, J. . | 2013 | ∅ | The Culture of Connectivity | ∅ | ∅ | Oxford University Press | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

Consolidated from 23 sources. Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

<table border="1" cellpadding="12" cellspacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: 2px solid #888; margin-top: 2em; background: #fafafa;">

<tr><td>

⚠️ AI-Assisted Research Disclaimer

This document was generated and structured with the assistance of AI tools.

While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, AI-assisted content may

contain errors, misattributions, or unintended inaccuracies. **Always

verify claims, dates, and sources independently** before citing or relying

on any information presented here.

• Sources may contain errors. Bibliography entries and cross-references

are checked by automated systems, but mistakes can occur. If something

looks wrong, it may be.

• Speculative and unverified claims are clearly labeled. This project

uses a four-tier evidence system:

• Tier 1 — Verified: Peer-reviewed, established scientific consensus.
• Tier 2 — Credible: Academically supported, debated but grounded.
• Tier 3 — Speculative: Plausible but unverified by mainstream science.
• Tier 4 — Dubious: No credible support or contradicted by evidence.
• This project maps multiple perspectives — not a single truth. Mainstream,

alternative, and skeptical viewpoints are presented side by side for

critical comparison, not endorsement. Inclusion does not imply agreement.

• We are actively improving. Source verification, factuality scoring,

and bibliography enrichment are ongoing. Each revision adds stronger

citations, corrects identified errors, and expands coverage.

📖 For full details on our verification methodology, scoring systems, and

quality metrics, see: Fact-Checking & Verification Systems

Think Openly. Check the sources. Draw your own conclusions.

</td></tr>

</table>