RESEARCH BASE

Search 3,717 documents across 34 fields — every claim tier-rated by evidence

3,717 documents 34 sections 47,686 citations 34,596+ keywords indexed 4 evidence tiers

15 results for "Kuhn"

G_3_20 Verified Modern Frameworks

G_3_20 — Kuhn's Paradigm Shifts: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) introduced the concept of the paradigm shift — the idea that science does not progress by linear accumulation of facts, but through periodic, discontinuous

paradigm shift Kuhn scientific revolution normal science anomaly incommensurability
H_2_11 Verified Suppression & Thesis

H_2_11 — Scientific Revolutions: Kuhn, Paradigm Shifts, and Resistance

Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) fundamentally altered understanding of how science changes by arguing that scientific progress is not a smooth, cumulative accumulation of knowledge but rather

paradigm shift scientific revolution Kuhn Lakatos Popper normal science
H_2_06 Suppression & Thesis

H_2_06 — Successful Paradigm Shifts in Archaeology: Cases Where Orthodoxy Was Wrong

The history of science contains well-documented cases where firmly held orthodoxies were overturned by new evidence, often after decades of resistance from established authorities. Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientif

paradigm shift Thomas Kuhn Clovis First pre-Clovis Monte Verde Göbekli Tepe
Verified

INTERDOC_58 — The Mechanism of Suppression: Institutional Cognitive Dissonance from 4th-Century Councils to 21st-Century Peer Review

Suppression of inconvenient knowledge is not primarily about conspiracy. It is about a psychological-institutional mechanism that recurs across very different historical contexts using very different surface vocabularies

suppression mechanism institutional cognitive dissonance identity-protective cognition paradigm shift peer review gatekeeping replication crisis
Credible

INTERDOC_26 — Forbidden Archaeology and Paradigm Gatekeeping

Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962) demonstrated that science does not progress by smooth accumulation of knowledge but through paradigm shifts: periods of "normal science" (working within accepte

forbidden archaeology paradigm shift Kuhn anomalous artifacts OOPArt academic suppression
ZC_3_02 Verified Social Science

ZC_3_02 — Sociology of Science and Knowledge

Sociology of knowledge examines how social conditions shape what counts as knowledge. Karl Mannheim (Ideology and Utopia, 1929/1936) argued that thought is "existentially determined" — shaped by the thinker's social posi

sociology of science sociology of knowledge Merton Kuhn social construction SSK
ZC_5_07 Verified Social Science

ZC_5_07 — Sociology of Knowledge: Social Construction, Paradigms, and Epistemic Communities

The sociology of knowledge investigates how social conditions — class position, institutional setting, cultural context, historical period, and power relations — shape the production, content, validation, and distributio

sociology of knowledge social construction Mannheim Berger Luckmann Kuhn
G_3_28 Modern Frameworks

G_3_28 — Phlogiston Theory: Productive Fiction and the Birth of Chemistry

Phlogiston theory — developed by German chemist and physician Georg Ernst Stahl in the early 18th century — held that all combustible materials contain a fire-principle called phlogiston (from the Greek phlogistós, "burn

phlogiston Georg Stahl Lavoisier oxygen combustion calx
H_2_04 Suppression & Thesis

H_2_04 — Scientific Censorship and Paradigm Defense

The history of science includes well-documented instances where

paradigm shift Thomas Kuhn Semmelweis effect
H_2_03 Suppression & Thesis

H_2_03 — Academic Gatekeeping, Paradigm Resistance, and the Sociology of Knowledge

Academic gatekeeping — the processes by which scientific communities control which ideas, methods, and practitioners gain legitimacy — is simultaneously essential to quality (filtering out error, fraud, and pseudoscience

gatekeeping paradigm Kuhn paradigm shift peer review publish or perish
H_2_16 Credible Suppression & Thesis

H_2_16 — Dissident Scientists: Careers Destroyed by Heterodox Views

The history of science includes numerous cases of researchers whose careers were damaged, marginalized, or destroyed because they advanced ideas that contradicted the prevailing scientific paradigm — ideas that were, in

dissident heterodox heresy career suppression paradigm
P_3_01 Philosophy & Meaning

P_3_01 — Epistemology — How Do We Know What We Know?

Epistemology — the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature, sources, and limits of knowledge — is arguably the most foundational discipline for any research project that evaluates claims across time, culture, and

epistemology empiricism rationalism Kant Bayesian inference falsificationism
P_3_05 Philosophy & Meaning

P_3_05 — Philosophy of Science — Demarcation, Method, and Progress

The philosophy of science investigates the foundations, methods, and implications of science — asking what distinguishes science from non-science (the demarcation problem), how scientific theories are confirmed or refute

philosophy of science Popper falsificationism Kuhn paradigm shift Lakatos
P_1_07 Philosophy & Meaning

P_1_07 — Deep Time and Cognitive Limits

This document examines Deep Time and Cognitive Limits, a topic within the Philosophy Meaning research area. Key areas of investigation include Origins of the Concept, The Scale Problem, The "Human Line" Problem. The anal

deep time John McPhee James Hutton Silurian Hypothesis Gavin Schmidt Adam Frank
I_5_11 Verified UAP Disclosure

I_5_11 — UAP Stigma and Scientific Taboo

The stigma surrounding UAP/UFO research is one of the most well-documented examples of scientific taboo — a topic that mainstream science considers illegitimate to investigate, not because evidence has been evaluated and

UAP stigma UFO taboo scientific taboo career risk Robertson Panel ridicule